<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Ladybird on MacWorks</title><link>https://macworks.dev/tags/ladybird/</link><description>Recent content in Ladybird on MacWorks</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><atom:link href="https://macworks.dev/tags/ladybird/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Simon Willison</title><link>https://macworks.dev/docs/today/simonwillison-2026-06-05/</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jan 0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://macworks.dev/docs/today/simonwillison-2026-06-05/</guid><description>&lt;h1 id="simon-willison--2026-06-05"&gt;Simon Willison — 2026-06-05&lt;a class="anchor" href="#simon-willison--2026-06-05"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h1&gt;
&lt;h2 id="highlight"&gt;Highlight&lt;a class="anchor" href="#highlight"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Simon highlights a major shift in open-source maintainership as Andreas Kling announces the Ladybird browser will no longer accept public pull requests. This points to a growing structural challenge in the generative AI era, where the sheer volume of AI-generated patches breaks the traditional open-source proxy of &amp;ldquo;effort equals good faith&amp;rdquo;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="posts"&gt;Posts&lt;a class="anchor" href="#posts"&gt;#&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="https://simonwillison.net/2026/Jun/5/andreas-kling/#atom-everything"&gt;Quoting Andreas Kling&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;
Simon shares a striking quote from Andreas Kling regarding the Ladybird browser project&amp;rsquo;s decision to halt public pull requests. Kling notes that LLMs and generative AI have decoupled the size of a patch from the effort required to create it, effectively destroying the assumption that large patches automatically represent good-faith contributions. The core takeaway here is that as AI reshapes coding workflows, open-source projects must shift their focus entirely to strict human accountability—ensuring that the people introducing changes are fully responsible for the consequences of that code entering the project.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>